Volcanic risk management practice evolution between vulnerability and resilience: the case of Arequipa in Peru

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorLièvre, Pascal
dc.contributor.authorMérour, Eléonore
dc.contributor.authorMorin, Julie
dc.contributor.authorMacedo Franco, Luisa Diomira
dc.contributor.authorRamos Palomino, Domingo
dc.contributor.authorRivera, Marco
dc.contributor.authorMasías Alvarez, Pablo
dc.contributor.authorvan Wyk de Vries, Benjamin
dc.coverage.spatialArequipa
dc.coverage.spatialPerú
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-30T10:58:09Z
dc.date.available2022-09-30T10:58:09Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-29
dc.description.abstractThis paper proposes a new way of understanding the debate between vulnerability and resilience. We mobilize on the theoretical level the notion of “paradigm” in the sense of Kuhn and, on the methodological level, Foucault’s notion of “apparatus” to understand volcanic risk management practices. Through an interdisciplinary approach, combining management, geography and Earth sciences, we study the evolution of volcanic risk management practice in Arequipa (Peru) from the 1990s to the present. To do this, we look at the history of volcanic risk management in Arequipa, using a qualitative interview methodology based on six in-depth centered interviews from the main actors of this history, supported by a 2-monthethnographywhichallowed access to large institutional documentation (reports, studies, archives, maps, pictures...). Management practices in Arequipa appear to be centered on the paradigm of vulnerability since the 1990s. Some operations since 2015 named as resilient emerge but they are still inscribed in the vulnerability paradigm. The results show the relevance of the theoretical and methodological framework chosen for Arequipa but also the possibility of using it in a more general way.es_ES
dc.description.peer-reviewPor pareses_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.identifier.citationLièvre, P., Mérour, E., Morin, J., Macedo, L., Ramos, D., Rivera, M., … van Wyk de Vries, B. (2022). Volcanic risk management practice evolution between vulnerability and resilience: The case of Arequipa in Peru.==$Frontiers in Earth Science, 10,$==877161. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.877161es_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.877161es_ES
dc.identifier.govdocindex-oti2018
dc.identifier.journalFrontiers in Earth Sciencees_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12816/5308
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:2296-6463
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/es_ES
dc.subjectVulnerabilityes_ES
dc.subjectResiliencees_ES
dc.subjectParadigmes_ES
dc.subjectRisk management practicees_ES
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.05.07es_ES
dc.titleVolcanic risk management practice evolution between vulnerability and resilience: the case of Arequipa in Perues_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lievre_et_al_2022_Frontiers_Earth_Science.pdf
Size:
1.55 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Artículos Científicos