Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.author Arango, M. C.
dc.contributor.author Strasser, F. O.
dc.contributor.author Bommer, J. J.
dc.contributor.author Cepeda, J. M.
dc.contributor.author Boroschek, R.
dc.contributor.author Hernández, D. A.
dc.contributor.author Tavera, Hernando
dc.coverage.spatial América Central
dc.coverage.spatial Perú
dc.coverage.spatial Chile
dc.date.accessioned 2018-09-21T12:36:08Z
dc.date.available 2018-09-21T12:36:08Z
dc.date.issued 2012-02
dc.identifier.citation Arango, M. C., Strasser, F. O., Bommer, J. J., Cepeda, J. M., Boroschek, R., Hernández, D. A., & Tavera, H. (2012). An evaluation of the applicability of current ground-motion models to the South and Central American subduction zones.==$Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 102$==(1), 143-168. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120110078 es_ES
dc.identifier.govdoc index-oti2018
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12816/3032
dc.description.abstract The applicability of existing ground‐motion prediction equations (GMPEs) for subduction‐zone earthquakes is an important issue to address in the assessment of the seismic hazard affecting the Peru–Chile and Central American regions. Few predictive equations exist that are derived from local data, and these do not generally meet the quality criteria required for use in modern seismic hazard analyses. This paper investigates the applicability of a set of global and regional subduction ground‐motion models to the Peru–Chile and Central American subduction zones, distinguishing between interface and intraslab events, in light of recently compiled ground‐motion data from these regions. Strong‐motion recordings and associated metadata compiled by Arango, Strasser, Bommer, Boroschek, et al. (2011) and Arango, Strasser, Bommer, Hernandez, et al. (2011) have been used to assess the performance of the candidate equations following the maximum‐likelihood approach of Scherbaum et al. (2004) and its extension to normalized intraevent and interevent residual distributions developed by Stafford et al. (2008). The results of this study are discussed in terms of the transportability of GMPEs for subduction‐zone environments from one region to another, with a view to providing guidance for developing ground‐motion logic trees for seismic hazard analysis in these regions. es_ES
dc.format application/pdf es_ES
dc.language.iso eng es_ES
dc.publisher Seismological Society of America es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof urn:issn:0037-1106
dc.rights info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess es_ES
dc.subject Earthquakes es_ES
dc.subject Geologic hazards es_ES
dc.subject Ground motion es_ES
dc.subject Models es_ES
dc.subject Natural hazards es_ES
dc.subject Numerical models es_ES
dc.subject Risk assessment es_ES
dc.title An evaluation of the applicability of current ground-motion models to the South and Central American subduction zones es_ES
dc.type info:eu-repo/semantics/article es_ES
dc.subject.ocde http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.05.00 es_ES
dc.subject.ocde http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.05.04 es_ES
dc.identifier.journal Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America es_ES
dc.description.peer-review Por pares es_ES
dc.identifier.doi https://doi.org/10.1785/0120110078 es_ES

Thumbnail

 Bloqueado

Colecciones

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem