Field Campaign Evaluation of Sensors Lufft GMX500 and MaxiMet WS100 in Peruvian Central Andes

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorValdivia Prado, Jairo Michael
dc.contributor.authorGuizado, David A.
dc.contributor.authorFlores Rojas, José Luis
dc.contributor.authorGamarra, Delia P.
dc.contributor.authorSilva Vidal, Yamina
dc.contributor.authorHuamán, Edith R.
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-23T14:59:00Z
dc.date.available2022-11-23T14:59:00Z
dc.date.issued2022-04-22
dc.description.abstractThe research presents the inter-comparison of atmospheric variables measured by 9 automatic weather stations. This set of data was compared with the measurements of other weather stations in order to standardize the values that must be adjusted when taken to different areas. The data of a set of a total of 9 GMX500, which measures conventional meteorological variables, and 10 WS100 sensors, which measures precipitation parameters. The automatic stations were set up at the Huancayo Observatory (Geophysical Institute of Peru) for a period of 5 months. The data set of GMX500 were evaluated comparing with the average of the 9 sensors and the WS100 was compared with an optical disdrometer Parsivel². The temperature, pressure, relative humidity, wind speed, rainfall rate, and drop size distribution were evaluated. A pair of GMX500 sensors presented high data dispersion; it was found found that the errors came from a bad configuration; once this problem was solved, good agreement was archived, with low RMSE and high correlation. It was found that the WS100 sensors overestimate the precipitation with a percentage bias close to 100% and the differences increase with the greater intensity of rain. The drop size distribution retrieved by WS100 have unrealistic behavior with higher concentrations in diameters of 1 mm and 5 mm, in addition to a flattened curve.es_ES
dc.description.peer-reviewPor pareses_ES
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_ES
dc.identifier.citationValdivia, J. M., Guizado, D. A., Flores-Rojas, J. L., Gamarra, D. P., Silva-Vidal, Y. F., & Huamán, E. R. (2022). Field Campaign Evaluation of Sensors Lufft GMX500 and MaxiMet WS100 in Peruvian Central Andes.==$Sensors, 22$==(9), 3219. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093219es_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/s22093219es_ES
dc.identifier.govdocindex-oti2018
dc.identifier.journalSensorses_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12816/5318
dc.language.isospaes_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:1424-8220
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/es_ES
dc.subjectMeteorological instrumentses_ES
dc.subjectDrop size distributiones_ES
dc.subjectDSDes_ES
dc.subjectHuancayo Observatoryes_ES
dc.subjectPeruvian Central Andeses_ES
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.05.09es_ES
dc.titleField Campaign Evaluation of Sensors Lufft GMX500 and MaxiMet WS100 in Peruvian Central Andeses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Valdivia_et_al_2022_Sensors.pdf
Size:
5.56 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Arbitrados