Barbaran Meza, J.Rojas, R.Navarro, L.Veliz, OscarDe la Jara, CésarMilla, Marco2021-07-092021-07-092021-06http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12816/4967Poster presented at the 2021 CEDAR Virtual Workshop, June 20-25.IGP network of optical instruments consist of two types of imaging instrumentation: Fabry-Perot Interferometers (FPI) and All-Sky imagers (ASI). The FPI can obtain two dimensional interferograms that are used to study the dynamics of the upper atmosphere. Since the deployment of the first FPI in 1985 and up to the implementation of the FPI network in 2009, which was fully operational in 2011, a processing technique based on Fourier decomposition of the interferogram spectra has been used. An improvement of this technique has been released with a better representation and fitting scheme of the Airy function parameters needed for better estimation of the airglow neutral winds and temperatures. Given that the new processing technique has potentially the ability to generate better products, reprocessing of the IGPs optical data base is being evaluated. First, the two methods need to be compared. In this work we present an analysis of the two methods comparison, showing differences, advantages, and possible improvements to implement.application/pdfenginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFabry-Perot interferometersNeutral windsOptical instrumentsReprocessing of data from Fabry-Perot interferometers (FPI) belonging to the IGP network of optical instrumentsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjecthttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#1.05.01